Evolution of PVT IP: From Analog Mixed Signal (AMS) to Digitally Assisted Analog (DAA) Architecture

Rohan Bhatnagar

Dec 08, 2025 / 3 min read

Introduction

As process technology continues to evolve, so must the IP that complements the SoCs using them. One example of an industry evolution is on the PVT monitoring IP side. The process, voltage, and temperature (PVT) monitors embedded within chips provide feedback on silicon status at every stage of the lifecycle, and most importantly while in mission-mode use in the field. The data gathered from the monitors enables adaptive/dynamic SoC performance optimization along with secondary benefits such as early prediction of impending chip failures and tracking of trends across a “fleet” of chips deployed worldwide.

The Problem

Today the advent of the AI revolution has led to an insatiable need for high performance computing for inference and LLM training and the foundries have stepped up to fulfill and meet the challenge of hyper Moore’s law. Today these big leaps are being made possible by the building block of the digital age: the gate-all-around (GAA) transistor. Unfortunately, the classic Bipolar junction transistor that has been the pillar of analog design for half a century has been getting fewer updates or is being eliminated in the new foundry processes geared towards high performance compute that is digital.

Adaptation for PVT IP

The design of PVT monitoring IP must undergo a major rethink to stay ahead of the curve and adapt to the advent of the GAA transistor. The current lack of thick oxide MOSFET device makes BJT based designs impractical since they operate at higher voltages around 1.2v. In some processes BJT is eliminated resulting in the need to use MOSFET or thermal resistor as a sensing element. This shift in sensing technology is pushing us away from AMS architecture for PVT IP. Simply put, adapt and evolve or become irrelevant fast. 

Digitally Assisted Analog (DAA) architecture has the benefit of not only a smaller area and lower power, but it also eliminates the need for shielding signal lines from the effect of noise/crosstalk needed for analog signals. Lower accuracy for DAA IP will be the main trade-off compared to AMS IP, however System on Chip (SoC) architects will be able to insert these IPs closer to actual intended points due to their smaller size, resulting in equivalent effective accuracy gains by eliminating proximity errors, thereby negating their own inherent accuracy limitations because of their digital nature.

AMS vs. DAA Architecture Comparison

Analog Mixed Signal (AMS) and Digitally Assisted Analog (DAA) designs both integrate analog and digital circuitry on a single chip, but they differ fundamentally in their design approach and the role of the digital part.

Feature

Analog Mixed Signal (AMS) Design

Digitally Assisted Analog (DAA) Design

Primary Design Focus

Relies heavily on traditional, manual analog design techniques to meet performance specifications

Leverages the strengths of advanced digital processing to overcome inherent limitations and manufacturing variability in analog circuits

Role of Digital Circuitry

Digital blocks provide interface logic/control, but the analog blocks are designed to fulfill the core functionality as independently as possible.

Digital circuitry is an integrated part of the analog block's operation, monitoring performance and actively applying real-time corrections (e.g., calibration, tuning, compensation) to the analog part.

Process Node Scaling

Analog circuits are sensitive to process variations and supply voltage reductions in advanced nodes, often requiring extensive redesigns

DAA designs scale better with advanced process nodes because of standard cell library provisioning and automated design flows

Accuracy and P-V-T compensation

AMS uses bandgap reference (PTAT/CTAT) that inherently compensates for PVT variation.

DAA uses digital processing for compensation and linearization.

Power and Area

High-performance traditional analog blocks can consume significant power and area.

Can achieve significant benefits in terms of power and area by using simpler analog circuits followed by digital processing

Analog-to-Digital relationship

Analog and digital circuits are mostly independent but must be physically separated to avoid interference (e.g., crosstalk).

Analog circuit performance is intentionally designed to be less precise, with the digital side performing the calibration, linearization, or complex calculations

Benefits of DAA Architecture

With DAA architecture, PVT IP will eliminate multiple issues reported by IP users, including:

  1. The modeling of the BJT by the fabs
  2. By eliminating the use of the BJT, there would no longer be a need for VDDA
  3. Area gets reduced when using MOSFETs over BJT
  4. Power is reduced, and power distribution network is simple with just core VDD
  5. With sense signals being digitized there is no need for custom routing and shielding
DAA Architecture

In essence, DAA is an evolution of the traditional AMS approach, where the digital component shifts from merely co-existing with analog circuits to actively enabling and enhancing their performance through calibration and correction, thereby addressing the challenges of designing high-performance analog systems in modern, scaled semiconductor technologies.

Continue Reading