| Men | Women | |
| Upper Pay Quartile | 86.8% | 13.2% |
| Upper Middle Pay Quartile | 79.5% | 20.5% |
| Lower Middle Pay Quartile | 76.9% | 23.1% |
| Lower Pay Quartile | 59.0% | 41.0% |
| Mean | Median |
| 18.4% | 18.4% |
| Men | Women |
| 85.5% | 89.5% |
| Mean | Median |
| 6.9% | 27.6% |
The difference in the average compensation of all men and all women across all roles. A pay gap usually is a result of more men occupying more senior and therefore higher paying—positions.
Commonly referred to as “equal pay for equal work,” this is an analysis of whether men and women are paid comparably for doing similar jobs, after controlling for legitimate differentiators such as performance and experience.
This Gender Pay Differences analysis highlights the variation in roles typically held by men and women, with men currently occupying a greater proportion of senior-level positions. As a result, the overall average pay for men is higher than that for women in Ireland.
It is important to note that this analysis does not assess Pay Equity, which examines whether individuals with comparable skills, experience, and performance are compensated comparably for performing similar work.
We remain confident that our compensation practices are fair and based on employees’ skills, expertise, and contributions—regardless of gender.
Ireland employees represent 0.7% of Synopsys’ global workforce for the reporting period.
This is our first year of reporting Gender Pay Results for Ireland.
Our data highlights ongoing challenges within the high-tech industry, particularly the gender imbalance in technical engineering roles, where men continue to be employed at significantly higher rates than women—especially at senior levels. This trend reflects broader labor market dynamics and the persistent gap in STEM education graduation rates, where fewer women than men pursue and complete STEM-related degrees.
In Ireland, technical engineering roles account for 83.9% of our total employee population in Ireland. Within this group, female representation stands at 16.9%, while male representation is 83.1%.
In contrast, other functions within our organization show stronger female representation:
And equal representation within.
In this initial reporting year, over 85.5% of both male and female employees received a bonus. Notably, a higher proportion of female employees—89.5%—received bonus remuneration.
In this initial reporting year, over 94% of both male and female employees received a Benefits in Kind. Notably, a higher proportion of female employees—97.4% received Benefits in Kind.