ASIL refers to Automotive Safety Integrity Level. It is a risk classification system defined by the ISO 26262 standard for the functional safety of road vehicles.
The standard defines functional safety as “the absence of unreasonable risk due to hazards caused by malfunctioning behavior of electrical or electronic systems.” ASILs establish safety requirements―based on the probability and acceptability of harm―for automotive components to be compliant with ISO 26262.
There are four ASILs identified by ISO 26262―A, B, C, and D. ASIL A represents the lowest degree and ASIL D represents the highest degree of automotive hazard.
Systems like airbags, anti-lock brakes, and power steering require an ASIL-D grade―the highest rigor applied to safety assurance―because the risks associated with their failure are the highest. On the other end of the safety spectrum, components like rear lights require only an ASIL-A grade. Head lights and brake lights generally would be ASIL-B while cruise control would generally be ASIL-C.
ASILs are established by performing hazard analysis and risk assessment. For each electronic component in a vehicle, engineers measure three specific variables:
Each of these variables is broken down into sub-classes. Severity has four classes ranging from “no injuries” (S0) to “life-threatening/fatal injuries” (S3). Exposure has five classes covering the “incredibly unlikely” (E0) to the “highly probable” (E4). Controllability has four classes ranging from “controllable in general” (C0) to “uncontrollable” (C3).
All variables and sub-classifications are analyzed and combined to determine the required ASIL. For example, a combination of the highest hazards (S3 + E4 + C3) would result in an ASIL D classification.
Determining an ASIL involves many variables and requires engineers to make assumptions. For example, even if a component is hypothetically “uncontrollable” (C3) and likely to cause “life-threatening/fatal injuries” (S3) if it malfunctions, it could still be classified as ASIL A (low risk) simply because there’s a low probability of exposure (E1) to the hazard.
ASIL definitions are informative rather than prescriptive, so they leave room for interpretation. A lot of room. ASIL vocabulary relies on adverbs (usually, likely, probably, unlikely). Does “usually” avoiding injury mean 60% of the time or 90% of the time? Is the probability of exposure to black ice the same in Tahiti as it is in Canada? And what about traffic density? Rush hour in Los Angeles vs. late morning on an empty stretch of road in the Australian Outback?
Simply put, ASIL classification depends on context and interpretation.
Given the guesswork involved in determining ASILS, the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) drafted J2980, “Considerations for ISO 26262 ASIL Hazard Classification” in 2015. These guidelines provide more explicit guidance for assessing Exposure, Severity, and Controllability for a given hazard. J2980 continues to evolve―the SAE published a revision in 2018.
With the evolution of the self-driving car, ISO 26262 will need to revisit the definition of “Controllability,” which currently pertains to the human driver. As the standard reads now, the absence of a human driver means that Controllability will always be C3, the extreme of “uncontrollable.” The other variables of Severity (injury) and Exposure (probability) will no doubt require re-examination as well.
ISO 26262 is a goal-based standard that’s all about “preventing harm.” Despite their challenges, ASIL classifications are intended to “prevent harm” and help us achieve the highest safety rating possible for myriad automotive components across a long and often disjointed supply chain.
Key benefits include:
The Synopsys IP portfolio with safety packages is ASIL B and D ready, ISO 26262 certified, and designed for use in safety-critical applications. Our ASIL-certified IP also accelerates SoC development for applications like advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS).
Our safety packages consist of failure modes effects and diagnostics analysis (FMEDA) reports, safety manuals, and certification reports to accelerate safety assessments and help you reach your target ASILs. Using Synopsys IP also reduces supply chain risk and accelerates the entire process of achieving SoC-level functional safety (from requirements specification to design, implementation, integration, verification, validation, and configuration).
Synopsys offers ISO 26262 ASIL D, TCL 1 certified solutions for virtual prototyping, multi-domain simulation and validation, as well as harness design.
A Holistic Solution Catalyzing Sustainable Gains in Engineering Quality, Speed, and Efficiency for Integrated Automotive Systems
Learn More →Samsung Foundry and Synopsys enable Samsung's automotive reference flow to meet target ASILs for safety-critical designs
Learn More →Synopsys' native automotive solutions enable designers to efficiently implement and verify functional safety mechanisms to achieve target ASIL for safety-critical SoCs
Learn More →
