Download Brochure
Contact Us
Contact Us
Contact Us
  • Software Integrity
  • Tools
  • Services
  • Training
  • Solutions
  • Resources
  • Customers
  • Partners
  • Blog
Contact Sales
  • Company
  • About Us
  • Investor Relations
  • Community
  • Newsroom
  • Resources
  • Careers
Contact Us
All Synopsys
+ Silicon Design & Verification + Silicon IP + Software Integrity + About Us
Support
SolvNetPlus Software Integrity Customer Community
Global SItes
日本語 简体中文 繁體中文 Deutsch Русский

OptSim Cladding-Pumped EDFA

Tool Used: OptSim

Cladding-pumped EDFAs have been identified as a solution for L-band amplification. In [1], the noise performance of these devices is studied for both co- and counter-propagating pump schemes. This example repeats some of the numerical studies from [1], illustrating the advantages of large pump claddings for the minimization of ASE noise in the amplifier, and therefore improved noise figure (NF). The OptSim Figure below depicts the topology used to study the noise performance of a cladding-pumped EDFA:

Noise performance of a cladding-pumped EDFA | Synopsys

In its initial configuration, this topology implements a co-propagating pump scheme. The EDFA (model block EDFAPhys) is configured for bi-directional operation in order to study the differences between forward and backward ASE (a cw signal of insignificant power is launched at the EDFA's backward input in order to facilitate the analysis). 

The plots below depict the ASE output powers of the EDFA in the forward and backward directions, respectively. As the results clearly indicate, while the ASE power in the forward direction is very low (tens of micro W) for all cladding areas, the backward ASE output power is very high (hundreds of mW) for small claddings, but significantly lower as the area is increased.

ASE output powers | Synopsys

Next, we will simulate the amplifier using a counter-propagating pump scheme:

Counter-propagating pump scheme | Synopsys

The plots for the forward and backward ASE outputs are shown below. Essentially, the results are the reverse of those presented in earlier plots, with the forward ASE now benefiting from large cladding areas. However, the same essential reasoning behind this behavior holds, with large cladding areas leading to more uniform pump distributions.

Forward and backward ASE outputs | Synopsys

To further demonstrate the benefits of large cladding areas, we plot of NF versus cladding area. As can be seen (see figure below), while the NF values are by no means low, they are significantly reduced for large cladding areas.

Plot of NF versus cladding area | Synopsys

References [1] M. Söderlund, S. Tammela, P. Pöyhönen, M. Leppihalme, and N. Peyghambarian, "Amplified spontaneous emission in cladding-pumped L-band erbium-doped fiber amplifiers," IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 22-24, January 2001.